Background of the Study
Reducing income inequality remains a top priority for many emerging economies, and fiscal policy is considered one of the most potent tools for achieving this objective. In Nigeria, fiscal measures introduced between 2023 and 2025—such as progressive taxation, increased social spending, and targeted subsidy reforms—have been deployed with the aim of narrowing the income gap between different socioeconomic groups. By redistributing wealth through improved tax collection and public transfers, these policies are expected to create a more balanced economic environment (Afolabi, 2023).
Fiscal policy, when effectively designed and implemented, can address structural inequities by providing financial support to low-income households and investing in human capital development. However, challenges such as administrative inefficiencies, corruption, and regional disparities often undermine the potential of these measures. Recent empirical studies indicate that while fiscal policy interventions have the capacity to reduce income inequality, their effectiveness is heavily dependent on the transparency and efficiency of policy execution (Ibrahim, 2024). Moreover, the overall impact is moderated by external factors such as inflation and global economic trends. This study aims to evaluate the role of fiscal policy in reducing income inequality by examining recent reforms and their outcomes. It will explore the mechanisms through which fiscal adjustments translate into redistributive effects, thereby informing policy recommendations for a more equitable Nigerian economy.
Statement of the Problem
Despite concerted efforts to use fiscal policy as a tool for reducing income inequality, Nigeria continues to experience significant disparities in wealth distribution. The measures implemented between 2023 and 2025 have yielded mixed results, with some regions experiencing modest improvements while others continue to lag behind (Afolabi, 2023). The gap between policy intent and real-world outcomes is largely attributed to issues such as inefficient public spending, corruption, and a narrow tax base that limits the reach of redistributive policies (Ibrahim, 2024). Additionally, the lack of robust data on income distribution and policy impact hampers the ability to conduct a thorough evaluation of these interventions. These challenges have led to persistent income inequality, which in turn affects overall economic stability and social cohesion. Therefore, it is imperative to critically assess the extent to which fiscal policy is successful in reducing income inequality and to identify the factors that impede its effectiveness.
Objectives of the Study
To evaluate the impact of recent fiscal policy measures on income inequality in Nigeria.
To identify the key challenges that hinder effective income redistribution.
To propose policy interventions that enhance the redistributive effects of fiscal measures.
Research Questions
How effective have fiscal policy measures been in reducing income inequality in Nigeria?
What are the main challenges in the implementation of redistributive fiscal policies?
What policy adjustments can further reduce income inequality?
Research Hypotheses
H1: Progressive fiscal policies significantly reduce income inequality in Nigeria.
H2: Inefficient public spending undermines the redistributive impact of fiscal measures.
H3: Improved transparency in fiscal administration leads to greater income equality.
Scope and Limitations of the Study
This study investigates fiscal policy measures aimed at reducing income inequality in Nigeria from 2023 to 2025. It employs data from governmental sources, income distribution surveys, and academic literature. Limitations include data gaps, external economic influences, and regional variability in policy implementation.
Definitions of Terms
Income Inequality: The uneven distribution of income among individuals or groups within an economy.
Redistributive Policies: Fiscal measures designed to reduce disparities in income or wealth.
Progressive Taxation: A tax system in which the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases.
Social Spending: Government expenditures on welfare programs aimed at supporting lower-income groups.
Background to the study
The review of information contained in the business's accounting reports ca...
Background of the Study
Banking regulation is essential for maintaining financial stability, consumer protection, and opera...
Background of the Study
University libraries are important sources of reference materials for high-qua...
Background of the study:
Gender diversity in leadership is increasingly recognized as a driver of organizational performanc...
EXCERPT FROM THE STUDY
There is a large and growing body of evidence that demonstrates a positive linkage between the de...
Background of the Study
Measuring the performance of rural banking services in agricultural finance is essential for ensuring sustainabil...
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Academic advising or counseling is said to be key to student success and academic achievements....
Background of the Study
Economic uncertainty in Nigeria—characterized by fluctuating exchange rates, volatile oil pr...
Background of the study
Local community educational initiatives have become a cornerstone in enhancing early childhood educ...
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study is to determine the knowledge, attitude and practices of nurses regarding infection preven...